1978 Austin Marina vs. 1954 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 1978 Austin Marina is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 5,114 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Ford Thunderbird (225 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 166 more horse power than 1978 Austin Marina. (59 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1954 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1978 Austin Marina. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 696 kg more than 1978 Austin Marina. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 Austin Marina | 1954 Ford Thunderbird | |
| Make | Austin | Ford |
| Model | Marina | Thunderbird |
| Year Released | 1978 | 1954 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1275 cc | 5114 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 225 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 70.6 mm | 96.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 81.3 mm | 87.4 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 882 kg | 1578 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2600 mm |
