1978 Austin Princess vs. 1995 Mazda Midge
To start off, 1995 Mazda Midge is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Austin Princess would be higher. At 1,700 cc (4 cylinders), 1978 Austin Princess is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Austin Princess weights approximately 194 kg more than 1995 Mazda Midge.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Austin Princess | 1995 Mazda Midge | |
Make | Austin | Mazda |
Model | Princess | Midge |
Year Released | 1978 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1700 cc | 1323 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 67 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 966 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1400 mm |