1978 Austin Princess vs. 1996 Mazda 626
To start off, 1996 Mazda 626 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Austin Princess would be higher. At 1,840 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Austin Princess weights approximately 20 kg more than 1996 Mazda 626.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Austin Princess | 1996 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Austin | Mazda |
Model | Princess | 626 |
Year Released | 1978 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1700 cc | 1840 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 104 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 1140 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2620 mm |