1978 Austin Princess vs. 2006 Dodge Charger
To start off, 2006 Dodge Charger is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Austin Princess would be higher. At 6,063 cc, 2006 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2006 Dodge Charger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Dodge Charger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Austin Princess, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Dodge Charger has automatic transmission and 1978 Austin Princess has manual transmission. 1978 Austin Princess will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Dodge Charger will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Austin Princess | 2006 Dodge Charger | |
Make | Austin | Dodge |
Model | Princess | Charger |
Year Released | 1978 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1700 cc | 6063 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 425 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 5090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 3050 mm |