1978 Austin Princess vs. 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Austin Princess would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 940 kg more than 1978 Austin Princess.
Because 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1978 Austin Princess. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee has automatic transmission and 1978 Austin Princess has manual transmission. 1978 Austin Princess will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Austin Princess | 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Austin | Jeep |
Model | Princess | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 1978 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1700 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 210 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 2100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4775 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1844 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2781 mm |