1978 Austin Princess vs. 2011 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2011 Dodge Ram is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Austin Princess would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2011 Dodge Ram is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Dodge Ram. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Austin Princess, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Austin Princess | 2011 Dodge Ram | |
Make | Austin | Dodge |
Model | Princess | Ram |
Year Released | 1978 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1700 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 212 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 5320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2900 mm |