1978 BMW 320 vs. 1958 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1978 BMW 320 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,979 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 BMW 320 (641 HP @ 9000 RPM) has 452 more horse power than 1958 Cadillac 62. (189 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1978 BMW 320 should accelerate faster than 1958 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1355 kg more than 1978 BMW 320.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 BMW 320 | 1958 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | 320 | 62 |
| Year Released | 1978 | 1958 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 5979 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 641 HP | 189 HP |
| Engine RPM | 9000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 2195 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 5640 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 3300 mm |
