1978 BMW 320 vs. 1990 Ford RS 200
To start off, 1990 Ford RS 200 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 BMW 320. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 BMW 320 would be higher. At 1,991 cc (6 cylinders), 1978 BMW 320 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 BMW 320 (641 HP @ 9000 RPM) has 391 more horse power than 1990 Ford RS 200. (250 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1978 BMW 320 should accelerate faster than 1990 Ford RS 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Ford RS 200 weights approximately 340 kg more than 1978 BMW 320.
Because 1990 Ford RS 200 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1978 BMW 320. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Ford RS 200 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1978 BMW 320 | 1990 Ford RS 200 | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | 320 | RS 200 |
Year Released | 1978 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1798 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 641 HP | 250 HP |
Engine RPM | 9000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2520 mm |