1978 BMW 320 vs. 2002 Ford GT 40
To start off, 2002 Ford GT 40 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 BMW 320. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 BMW 320 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 BMW 320 (641 HP @ 9000 RPM) has 291 more horse power than 2002 Ford GT 40. (350 HP @ 7200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1978 BMW 320 should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford GT 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford GT 40 weights approximately 680 kg more than 1978 BMW 320.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 BMW 320 | 2002 Ford GT 40 | |
| Make | BMW | Ford |
| Model | 320 | GT 40 |
| Year Released | 1978 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 4195 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 641 HP | 350 HP |
| Engine RPM | 9000 RPM | 7200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 1520 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1960 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1110 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2620 mm |
