1978 BMW 320 vs. 2003 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2003 Honda CR-V is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 BMW 320. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 BMW 320 would be higher. At 2,360 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 BMW 320 (641 HP @ 9000 RPM) has 481 more horse power than 2003 Honda CR-V. (160 HP @ 6300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1978 BMW 320 should accelerate faster than 2003 Honda CR-V. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Honda CR-V weights approximately 678 kg more than 1978 BMW 320.
Because 2003 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1978 BMW 320. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 Honda CR-V has automatic transmission and 1978 BMW 320 has manual transmission. 1978 BMW 320 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Honda CR-V will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1978 BMW 320 | 2003 Honda CR-V | |
Make | BMW | Honda |
Model | 320 | CR-V |
Year Released | 1978 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 2360 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 641 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 9000 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 1518 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2630 mm |