1978 BMW 320 vs. 2009 Cadillac CTS-V
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 BMW 320. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 BMW 320 would be higher. At 6,162 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 BMW 320 (641 HP @ 9000 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 2009 Cadillac CTS-V. (542 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1978 BMW 320 should accelerate faster than 2009 Cadillac CTS-V.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1978 BMW 320 | 2009 Cadillac CTS-V | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | 320 | CTS-V |
Year Released | 1978 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 6162 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 641 HP | 542 HP |
Engine RPM | 9000 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2890 mm |