1978 BMW 628 vs. 1962 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1978 BMW 628 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1978 BMW 628. (185 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1978 BMW 628.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 322 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 BMW 628. (260 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 BMW 628.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 BMW 628 | 1962 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | 628 | 62 |
| Year Released | 1978 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2997 cc | 6388 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 185 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 260 Nm | 582 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 5650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 75 L |
