1978 BMW 628 vs. 2000 Ford 24.7
To start off, 2000 Ford 24.7 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 BMW 628. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 BMW 628 would be higher. At 2,997 cc (8 cylinders), 1978 BMW 628 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 BMW 628 (185 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 2000 Ford 24.7. (128 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1978 BMW 628 should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford 24.7.
Because 1978 BMW 628 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 BMW 628. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Ford 24.7, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford 24.7 (359 Nm) has 99 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 BMW 628. (260 Nm). This means 2000 Ford 24.7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 BMW 628.
Compare all specifications:
1978 BMW 628 | 2000 Ford 24.7 | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | 628 | 24.7 |
Year Released | 1978 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2997 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 185 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 260 Nm | 359 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2580 mm |