1978 BMW 628 vs. 2004 Cadillac Escalade
To start off, 2004 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 BMW 628. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 BMW 628 would be higher. At 5,998 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Cadillac Escalade (345 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 160 more horse power than 1978 BMW 628. (185 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac Escalade should accelerate faster than 1978 BMW 628.
Because 2004 Cadillac Escalade is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1978 BMW 628. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac Escalade will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Cadillac Escalade (515 Nm) has 255 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 BMW 628. (260 Nm). This means 2004 Cadillac Escalade will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 BMW 628.
Compare all specifications:
1978 BMW 628 | 2004 Cadillac Escalade | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | 628 | Escalade |
Year Released | 1978 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2997 cc | 5998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 185 HP | 345 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 260 Nm | 515 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 5060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2950 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 98 L |