1978 BMW 628 vs. 2006 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2006 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 BMW 628. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 BMW 628 would be higher. At 4,392 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Land Rover Range Rover (305 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 1978 BMW 628. (185 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1978 BMW 628.
Because 2006 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1978 BMW 628. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Land Rover Range Rover (441 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 181 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 BMW 628. (260 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 BMW 628.
Compare all specifications:
1978 BMW 628 | 2006 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | BMW | Land Rover |
Model | 628 | Range Rover |
Year Released | 1978 | 2006 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2997 cc | 4392 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 185 HP | 305 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 260 Nm | 441 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1910 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 104 L |