1978 BMW 725 vs. 1992 Rover 620i
To start off, 1992 Rover 620i is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 BMW 725. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 BMW 725 would be higher. At 2,495 cc (6 cylinders), 1978 BMW 725 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 BMW 725 (148 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1992 Rover 620i. (113 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1978 BMW 725 should accelerate faster than 1992 Rover 620i.
Because 1978 BMW 725 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 BMW 725. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Rover 620i, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1978 BMW 725 (215 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Rover 620i. (172 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 1978 BMW 725 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Rover 620i.
Compare all specifications:
1978 BMW 725 | 1992 Rover 620i | |
Make | BMW | Rover |
Model | 725 | 620i |
Year Released | 1978 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2495 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 113 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 215 Nm | 172 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86.1 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 71.6 mm | 88 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1390 mm |