1978 BMW 725 vs. 1999 Ford Econoline
To start off, 1999 Ford Econoline is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 BMW 725. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 BMW 725 would be higher. At 6,801 cc (10 cylinders), 1999 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Ford Econoline (302 HP @ 4250 RPM) has 154 more horse power than 1978 BMW 725. (148 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Ford Econoline should accelerate faster than 1978 BMW 725.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Ford Econoline (569 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 354 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 BMW 725. (215 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1999 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 BMW 725.
Compare all specifications:
1978 BMW 725 | 1999 Ford Econoline | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | 725 | Econoline |
Year Released | 1978 | 1999 |
Body Type | Sedan | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2495 cc | 6801 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 10 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 302 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Torque | 215 Nm | 569 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86.1 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 71.6 mm | 106 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 3510 mm |