1978 BMW B7 vs. 2005 Kia Shuma II
To start off, 2005 Kia Shuma II is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 BMW B7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 BMW B7 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 1978 BMW B7 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia Shuma II weights approximately 500 kg more than 1978 BMW B7.
Because 1978 BMW B7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 BMW B7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Kia Shuma II, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1978 BMW B7 (627 Nm) has 470 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Kia Shuma II. (157 Nm). This means 1978 BMW B7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Kia Shuma II.
Compare all specifications:
1978 BMW B7 | 2005 Kia Shuma II | |
Make | BMW | Kia |
Model | B7 | Shuma II |
Year Released | 1978 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3500 cc | 1793 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 109 HP |
Torque | 627 Nm | 157 Nm |
Top Speed | 262 km/hour | 196 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 2000 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 50 L |