1978 BMW M1 vs. 2000 GMC Sierra
To start off, 2000 GMC Sierra is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 BMW M1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 BMW M1 would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 BMW M1 (273 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 2000 GMC Sierra. (197 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1978 BMW M1 should accelerate faster than 2000 GMC Sierra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 GMC Sierra weights approximately 475 kg more than 1978 BMW M1.
Because 2000 GMC Sierra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1978 BMW M1. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 GMC Sierra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 GMC Sierra (353 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 BMW M1. (330 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2000 GMC Sierra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 BMW M1.
Compare all specifications:
1978 BMW M1 | 2000 GMC Sierra | |
Make | BMW | GMC |
Model | M1 | Sierra |
Year Released | 1978 | 2000 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 3453 cc | 4293 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 273 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 330 Nm | 353 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 1775 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 5170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 2000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1140 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 3030 mm |