1978 Bristol 412 vs. 1989 Rover Range Rover
To start off, 1989 Rover Range Rover is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Bristol 412. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Bristol 412 would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1978 Bristol 412 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Rover Range Rover (185 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1978 Bristol 412. (171 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1989 Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1978 Bristol 412. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Rover Range Rover weights approximately 296 kg more than 1978 Bristol 412. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1989 Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1978 Bristol 412. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1978 Bristol 412 (366 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Rover Range Rover. (319 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 1978 Bristol 412 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Rover Range Rover.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Bristol 412 | 1989 Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Bristol | Rover |
Model | 412 | Range Rover |
Year Released | 1978 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5898 cc | 3947 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 171 HP | 185 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Torque | 366 Nm | 319 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 94.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90.9 mm | 71.1 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.4:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1690 kg | 1986 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4950 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2550 mm |