1978 Bristol 412 vs. 2002 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2002 Jaguar XJ is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Bristol 412. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Bristol 412 would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1978 Bristol 412 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar XJ (301 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 130 more horse power than 1978 Bristol 412. (171 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1978 Bristol 412. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 110 kg more than 1978 Bristol 412. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jaguar XJ (541 Nm) has 175 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Bristol 412. (366 Nm). This means 2002 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Bristol 412.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Bristol 412 | 2002 Jaguar XJ | |
Make | Bristol | Jaguar |
Model | 412 | XJ |
Year Released | 1978 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5898 cc | 4196 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 171 HP | 301 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 366 Nm | 541 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1690 kg | 1800 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 3040 mm |