1978 Bristol 412 vs. 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Bristol 412. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Bristol 412 would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1978 Bristol 412 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (195 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1978 Bristol 412. (171 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1978 Bristol 412. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 74 kg more than 1978 Bristol 412. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1978 Bristol 412 (366 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (312 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1978 Bristol 412 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Bristol 412 | 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Bristol | Jeep |
Model | 412 | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 1978 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5898 cc | 3966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 171 HP | 195 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 366 Nm | 312 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 99 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90.9 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 8.8:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1690 kg | 1764 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4950 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2700 mm |