1978 Bristol 412 vs. 2006 Chevrolet Impala

To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Bristol 412. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Bristol 412 would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1978 Bristol 412 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Impala (240 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 1978 Bristol 412. (171 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Impala should accelerate faster than 1978 Bristol 412.

Because 1978 Bristol 412 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Bristol 412. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Impala, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1978 Bristol 412 (366 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Chevrolet Impala. (328 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1978 Bristol 412 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Chevrolet Impala.

Compare all specifications:

1978 Bristol 412 2006 Chevrolet Impala
Make Bristol Chevrolet
Model 412 Impala
Year Released 1978 2006
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5898 cc 3884 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Horse Power 171 HP 240 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 366 Nm 328 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 4400 RPM
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Length 4950 mm 5100 mm
Vehicle Width 1780 mm 1860 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 1500 mm
Wheelbase Size 2910 mm 2810 mm