1978 Bristol 412 vs. 2006 Mazda 5
To start off, 2006 Mazda 5 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Bristol 412. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Bristol 412 would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1978 Bristol 412 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Bristol 412 (171 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 2006 Mazda 5. (157 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1978 Bristol 412 should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda 5.
Because 1978 Bristol 412 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Bristol 412. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1978 Bristol 412 (366 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 165 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda 5. (201 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1978 Bristol 412 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda 5.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Bristol 412 | 2006 Mazda 5 | |
Make | Bristol | Mazda |
Model | 412 | 5 |
Year Released | 1978 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5898 cc | 2262 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 171 HP | 157 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 366 Nm | 201 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 6 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4950 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2760 mm |