1978 Buick Regal vs. 1950 Holden FX
To start off, 1978 Buick Regal is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Holden FX would be higher. At 3,214 cc (6 cylinders), 1978 Buick Regal is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Buick Regal (90 HP) has 39 more horse power than 1950 Holden FX. (51 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1978 Buick Regal should accelerate faster than 1950 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Buick Regal weights approximately 460 kg more than 1950 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1978 Buick Regal (224 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 Holden FX. (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1978 Buick Regal will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 Holden FX.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Buick Regal | 1950 Holden FX | |
Make | Buick | Holden |
Model | Regal | FX |
Year Released | 1978 | 1950 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3214 cc | 2165 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 51 HP |
Torque | 224 Nm | 136 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1430 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1580 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2620 mm |