1978 Buick Regal vs. 2000 Mercedes-Benz C

To start off, 2000 Mercedes-Benz C is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Buick Regal. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Buick Regal would be higher. At 3,214 cc (6 cylinders), 1978 Buick Regal is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Buick Regal (104 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2000 Mercedes-Benz C. (100 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1978 Buick Regal should accelerate faster than 2000 Mercedes-Benz C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mercedes-Benz C weights approximately 30 kg more than 1978 Buick Regal.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Mercedes-Benz C (236 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Buick Regal. (218 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2000 Mercedes-Benz C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Buick Regal.

Compare all specifications:

1978 Buick Regal 2000 Mercedes-Benz C
Make Buick Mercedes-Benz
Model Regal C
Year Released 1978 2000
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3214 cc 2148 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 104 HP 100 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 4200 RPM
Torque 218 Nm 236 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 1500 RPM
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1430 kg 1460 kg
Vehicle Length 5090 mm 4520 mm
Vehicle Width 1840 mm 1730 mm
Vehicle Height 1370 mm 1470 mm
Wheelbase Size 2750 mm 2760 mm