1978 Buick Skyhawk vs. 2010 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac CTS is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Buick Skyhawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Buick Skyhawk would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1978 Buick Skyhawk is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 421 kg more than 1978 Buick Skyhawk.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Buick Skyhawk | 2010 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Buick | Cadillac |
Model | Skyhawk | CTS |
Year Released | 1978 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 270 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1335 kg | 1756 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4867 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1504 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2880 mm |