1978 Cadillac Brougham vs. 1959 Ford Fairlane
To start off, 1978 Cadillac Brougham is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 5,769 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 144 kg more than 1978 Cadillac Brougham.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 Cadillac Brougham | 1959 Ford Fairlane | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | Brougham | Fairlane |
| Year Released | 1978 | 1959 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5032 cc | 5769 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 168 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1950 kg | 2094 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 5260 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 3000 mm |
