1978 Cadillac Brougham vs. 2002 Cadillac Escalade
To start off, 2002 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 5,966 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 728 kg more than 1978 Cadillac Brougham.
Because 2002 Cadillac Escalade is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1978 Cadillac Brougham. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Cadillac Escalade will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Cadillac Brougham | 2002 Cadillac Escalade | |
Make | Cadillac | Cadillac |
Model | Brougham | Escalade |
Year Released | 1978 | 2002 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5032 cc | 5966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 340 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1950 kg | 2678 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 5630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 2030 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 3310 mm |