1978 Cadillac Brougham vs. 2006 Suzuki Reno
To start off, 2006 Suzuki Reno is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 5,032 cc (8 cylinders), 1978 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 885 kg more than 2006 Suzuki Reno.
Because 2006 Suzuki Reno is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1978 Cadillac Brougham. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Suzuki Reno will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Cadillac Brougham | 2006 Suzuki Reno | |
Make | Cadillac | Suzuki |
Model | Brougham | Reno |
Year Released | 1978 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5032 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 126 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1950 kg | 1065 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2610 mm |