1978 Cadillac Brougham vs. 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV
To start off, 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 780 kg more than 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Cadillac Brougham | 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV | |
Make | Cadillac | Mitsubishi |
Model | Brougham | i-MiEV |
Year Released | 1978 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1950 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 3678 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1585 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2550 mm |