1978 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1952 Alfa Romeo 1900
To start off, 1978 Cadillac DeVille is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Alfa Romeo 1900. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Alfa Romeo 1900 would be higher. At 6,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1978 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 910 kg more than 1952 Alfa Romeo 1900.
Because 1952 Alfa Romeo 1900 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Alfa Romeo 1900. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Cadillac DeVille | 1952 Alfa Romeo 1900 | |
Make | Cadillac | Alfa Romeo |
Model | DeVille | 1900 |
Year Released | 1978 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6028 cc | 1883 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 100 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1910 kg | 1000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5620 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2510 mm |