1978 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1968 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1978 Cadillac DeVille is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 6,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1978 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 970 kg more than 1968 Mazda Cosmo.
Because 1968 Mazda Cosmo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Mazda Cosmo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1978 Cadillac DeVille has automatic transmission and 1968 Mazda Cosmo has manual transmission. 1968 Mazda Cosmo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1978 Cadillac DeVille will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Cadillac DeVille | 1968 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | DeVille | Cosmo |
Year Released | 1978 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6028 cc | 1964 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 94 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1910 kg | 940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5620 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1170 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2210 mm |