1978 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1999 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1999 Ford Mustang is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1978 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 702 kg more than 1999 Ford Mustang.
Because 1999 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1978 Cadillac DeVille has automatic transmission and 1999 Ford Mustang has manual transmission. 1999 Ford Mustang will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1978 Cadillac DeVille will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 Cadillac DeVille | 1999 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | DeVille | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1978 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6028 cc | 1753 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1910 kg | 1208 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5620 mm | 4620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2540 mm |
