1978 Cadillac Eldorado vs. 1966 DKW Munga
To start off, 1978 Cadillac Eldorado is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DKW Munga would be higher. At 6,964 cc (8 cylinders), 1978 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Cadillac Eldorado (171 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 128 more horse power than 1966 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1978 Cadillac Eldorado should accelerate faster than 1966 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Cadillac Eldorado weights approximately 1120 kg more than 1966 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1978 Cadillac Eldorado. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Cadillac Eldorado | 1966 DKW Munga | |
Make | Cadillac | DKW |
Model | Eldorado | Munga |
Year Released | 1978 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6964 cc | 978 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 171 HP | 43 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 2230 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 3450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2010 mm |