1978 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2000 Lada Tarzan
To start off, 2000 Lada Tarzan is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 5,735 cc (8 cylinders), 1978 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Chevrolet Camaro (165 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 2000 Lada Tarzan. (77 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1978 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2000 Lada Tarzan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 540 kg more than 2000 Lada Tarzan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Lada Tarzan is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1978 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Lada Tarzan will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1978 Chevrolet Camaro (358 Nm) has 241 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Lada Tarzan. (117 Nm). This means 1978 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Lada Tarzan.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Chevrolet Camaro | 2000 Lada Tarzan | |
Make | Chevrolet | Lada |
Model | Camaro | Tarzan |
Year Released | 1978 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5735 cc | 1499 cc |
Horse Power | 165 HP | 77 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 358 Nm | 117 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1585 kg | 1045 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2500 mm |