1978 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2006 Mitsubishi Raider
To start off, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 5,735 cc (8 cylinders), 1978 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider (211 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 1978 Chevrolet Camaro. (165 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider should accelerate faster than 1978 Chevrolet Camaro.
Let's talk about torque, 1978 Chevrolet Camaro (358 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mitsubishi Raider. (319 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1978 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mitsubishi Raider.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 Chevrolet Camaro | 2006 Mitsubishi Raider | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Camaro | Raider |
| Year Released | 1978 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5735 cc | 3704 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 165 HP | 211 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 358 Nm | 319 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 5590 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1750 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 3340 mm |
