1978 Chevrolet Caprice vs. 2005 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2005 Ford Ecosport is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Chevrolet Caprice. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Chevrolet Caprice would be higher. At 4,093 cc (6 cylinders), 1978 Chevrolet Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Ecosport (143 HP) has 35 more horse power than 1978 Chevrolet Caprice. (108 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1978 Chevrolet Caprice.
Because 1978 Chevrolet Caprice is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Chevrolet Caprice. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1978 Chevrolet Caprice has automatic transmission and 2005 Ford Ecosport has manual transmission. 2005 Ford Ecosport will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1978 Chevrolet Caprice will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Chevrolet Caprice | 2005 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Caprice | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1978 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4093 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 143 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2490 mm |