1978 Chevrolet El Camino vs. 1956 Volvo 120
To start off, 1978 Chevrolet El Camino is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Volvo 120. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Volvo 120 would be higher. In terms of performance, 1978 Chevrolet El Camino (350 HP) has 291 more horse power than 1956 Volvo 120. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1978 Chevrolet El Camino should accelerate faster than 1956 Volvo 120.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 Chevrolet El Camino | 1956 Volvo 120 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Volvo |
| Model | El Camino | 120 |
| Year Released | 1978 | 1956 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 59 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2980 mm | 2610 mm |
