1978 Chevrolet El Camino vs. 1966 DAF Daffodil
To start off, 1978 Chevrolet El Camino is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. In terms of performance, 1978 Chevrolet El Camino (350 HP) has 324 more horse power than 1966 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1978 Chevrolet El Camino should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF Daffodil.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Chevrolet El Camino | 1966 DAF Daffodil | |
Make | Chevrolet | DAF |
Model | El Camino | Daffodil |
Year Released | 1978 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 26 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 3620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2980 mm | 2060 mm |