1978 Chevrolet El Camino vs. 1967 NSU Ro 80
To start off, 1978 Chevrolet El Camino is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 NSU Ro 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 NSU Ro 80 would be higher. In terms of performance, 1978 Chevrolet El Camino (350 HP) has 236 more horse power than 1967 NSU Ro 80. (114 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1978 Chevrolet El Camino should accelerate faster than 1967 NSU Ro 80.
Because 1978 Chevrolet El Camino is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Chevrolet El Camino. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1967 NSU Ro 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Chevrolet El Camino | 1967 NSU Ro 80 | |
Make | Chevrolet | NSU |
Model | El Camino | Ro 80 |
Year Released | 1978 | 1967 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 114 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2980 mm | 2870 mm |