1978 Chevrolet El Camino vs. 1969 ZAZ 966
To start off, 1978 Chevrolet El Camino is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 ZAZ 966. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 ZAZ 966 would be higher. In terms of performance, 1978 Chevrolet El Camino (350 HP) has 323 more horse power than 1969 ZAZ 966. (27 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1978 Chevrolet El Camino should accelerate faster than 1969 ZAZ 966.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 Chevrolet El Camino | 1969 ZAZ 966 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | ZAZ |
| Model | El Camino | 966 |
| Year Released | 1978 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 27 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 3740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2980 mm | 2170 mm |
