1978 Chevrolet El Camino vs. 1976 Volvo 260
To start off, 1978 Chevrolet El Camino is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Volvo 260. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Volvo 260 would be higher. In terms of performance, 1978 Chevrolet El Camino (350 HP) has 202 more horse power than 1976 Volvo 260. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1978 Chevrolet El Camino should accelerate faster than 1976 Volvo 260.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Chevrolet El Camino | 1976 Volvo 260 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Volvo |
Model | El Camino | 260 |
Year Released | 1978 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 148 HP |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2980 mm | 2660 mm |