1978 Chevrolet El Camino vs. 1997 Ford Aerostar
To start off, 1997 Ford Aerostar is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Chevrolet El Camino. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Chevrolet El Camino would be higher. In terms of performance, 1978 Chevrolet El Camino (350 HP) has 217 more horse power than 1997 Ford Aerostar. (133 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1978 Chevrolet El Camino should accelerate faster than 1997 Ford Aerostar.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 Chevrolet El Camino | 1997 Ford Aerostar | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
| Model | El Camino | Aerostar |
| Year Released | 1978 | 1997 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 133 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 4450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1860 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2980 mm | 3030 mm |
