1978 Chevrolet El Camino vs. 2005 Koenigsegg CCR
To start off, 2005 Koenigsegg CCR is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Chevrolet El Camino. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Chevrolet El Camino would be higher. In terms of performance, 2005 Koenigsegg CCR (816 HP) has 466 more horse power than 1978 Chevrolet El Camino. (350 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Koenigsegg CCR should accelerate faster than 1978 Chevrolet El Camino.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1978 Chevrolet El Camino has automatic transmission and 2005 Koenigsegg CCR has manual transmission. 2005 Koenigsegg CCR will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1978 Chevrolet El Camino will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Chevrolet El Camino | 2005 Koenigsegg CCR | |
Make | Chevrolet | Koenigsegg |
Model | El Camino | CCR |
Year Released | 1978 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 816 HP |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 8.6:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 4191 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1989 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1069 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2980 mm | 2659 mm |