1978 Chevrolet El Camino vs. 2006 MG TF
To start off, 2006 MG TF is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Chevrolet El Camino. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Chevrolet El Camino would be higher. In terms of performance, 1978 Chevrolet El Camino (350 HP) has 191 more horse power than 2006 MG TF. (159 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1978 Chevrolet El Camino should accelerate faster than 2006 MG TF.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1978 Chevrolet El Camino has automatic transmission and 2006 MG TF has manual transmission. 2006 MG TF will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1978 Chevrolet El Camino will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Chevrolet El Camino | 2006 MG TF | |
Make | Chevrolet | MG |
Model | El Camino | TF |
Year Released | 1978 | 2006 |
Body Type | Coupe | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 159 HP |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2980 mm | 2380 mm |