1978 Chevrolet Impala vs. 1996 Ford Taurus
To start off, 1996 Ford Taurus is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Chevrolet Impala. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Chevrolet Impala would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1978 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1978 Chevrolet Impala is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Chevrolet Impala. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Ford Taurus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Chevrolet Impala | 1996 Ford Taurus | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Impala | Taurus |
Year Released | 1978 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3790 cc | 2986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 5460 mm | 5030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2760 mm |