1978 Chevrolet Impala vs. 1996 Mazda MX-3
To start off, 1996 Mazda MX-3 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Chevrolet Impala. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Chevrolet Impala would be higher. At 3,788 cc (6 cylinders), 1978 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Chevrolet Impala weights approximately 551 kg more than 1996 Mazda MX-3.
Because 1978 Chevrolet Impala is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Chevrolet Impala. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mazda MX-3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1978 Chevrolet Impala | 1996 Mazda MX-3 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
| Model | Impala | MX-3 |
| Year Released | 1978 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3788 cc | 1596 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 106 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1610 kg | 1059 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5400 mm | 4230 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1320 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2460 mm |
