1978 Chevrolet Impala vs. 2002 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2002 Volvo XC90 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Chevrolet Impala. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Chevrolet Impala would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1978 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Chevrolet Impala weights approximately 163 kg more than 2002 Volvo XC90.
Because 2002 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1978 Chevrolet Impala. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Chevrolet Impala | 2002 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Volvo |
Model | Impala | XC90 |
Year Released | 1978 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3790 cc | 2519 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 197 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1614 kg | 1451 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5460 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2860 mm |