1978 Chevrolet Impala vs. 2010 Ford E-150
To start off, 2010 Ford E-150 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Chevrolet Impala. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Chevrolet Impala would be higher. At 4,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Chevrolet Impala weights approximately 92 kg more than 2010 Ford E-150.
Because 1978 Chevrolet Impala is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Chevrolet Impala. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-150, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1978 Chevrolet Impala | 2010 Ford E-150 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Impala | E-150 |
Year Released | 1978 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3790 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 171 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1614 kg | 1522 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5460 mm | 4437 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1725 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2619 mm |